
The first issue I want to address is the appeal of these shows. Why are they so popular? I surmise that theme park managers love them because they are safe in the sense that they have multi-cultural and multi-generational appeal. Anyone can be amazed by the feats of the human body because that is something every human shares. Prolific columnist Linda Sharp conjectures that in a more health-conscious, exercise-obsessed world, people are drawn to and inspired by the physically fit performers of Cirque du Soleil. "If you are ever in the market for a truly humbling experience in terms of what the human body is actually capable of, take in any performance of the Cirque du Soleil — Be it live or televised," Sharp advises, "those one hundred sit-ups and two miles on the treadmill won't seem like such an accomplishment anymore." The traditional theme park style musical show can alienate certain people with its musical style (showtune, rock 'n' roll, funk, etc.) or storyline (if there is one), but anyone can appreciate acrobatics without any previous pop culture knowledge. Cirque-style entertainment is just the latest trend of bland mass-appeal theme park fads such as stunt and extreme sports shows from the 1980's and 1990's. Yet there is an interesting paradox regarding Cirque du Soleil that should be noted: even though the white, middle-class has been a traditionally homophobic group as we have just seen in the current election, it is precisely the white, middle-class who have popularized Cirque-style acrobatics despite the blatant homosexual undertones (see pictures, above and below). The cheapest "obstructed view" ticket at Las Vegas's notoriously homoerotic, Zumanity, costs $69, yet the show's success, in addition to the success of all the other Cirque productions, suggests that America has wholly embraced evenings of perfectly toned bodies, tight spandex, garish face paint, flamboyant costumage, and man grappling. When did same-sex ballet become more popular than "76 Trombones?"
Although the mass adoration of Cirque du Soleil may be a paradox, my own feelings toward it most certainly are not. I will have to diverge from the theme park world for a moment to explain my distaste. The Cirque-style show has usurped the position of real circuses such as Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey and commandeered the term "circus."

Theme park show fads like Cirque-style acrobatics can be entertaining at first, but they have been around for a good ten years now and I have seen the same boring formula repeated over and over again. It is time to find something new. Cirque du Soleil can have its own theatrical venues where I never have to see them, but they need to get out of my beloved theme parks. They are preventing the development of fresh ideas and filling the venue space of better traditional performances. Hopefully, the scathing reviews for the latest Cirque du Soleil abomination, Criss Angel: BiLIEve, which opened on Halloween, are a sign of the demise of the New Age acrobatics tyranny. On the other hand, the struggling economy has severely decreased Broadway ticket sales, which cannot be a good sign for theater in general. An even worse thought than Cirque show saturated theme parks, is a world with no shows at all, and that is a very sad thought indeed. Theatrical entertainment is just as important to the theme park experience as rides, so come on parks! Get out of this boring slump and entertain me with a show!